Skip to the tool

Independent administrative support tool. Not affiliated with the NDIA.

JustifyMyClaim.Start your letter

Your NDIS claim, justified.

Turn a purchase into a Reasonable and Necessary letter, checked against all of the Section 34 reasonable and necessary criteria, in about two minutes.

Start your letter

Free. No sign-up. Your claim details stay in your browser.

How it works

1

Describe the claim

Plain-language steps: who the participant is, the budget, the item, the plan goal, the daily hurdle it solves, the realistic risk if it is not funded, and your value evidence.

2

Pass the coherence check

Your item, goal and limitation are cross-checked against each other and the Section 34 criteria. If the claim does not hang together, the tool tells you exactly what to fix. No letter is generated blindly.

3

Save your letter

A formal justification statement in the standard NDIS supporting-letter format, drafted from your own words and ready to download as a PDF or copy.

Build your letter

Answer the steps below, then generate. Every answer stays on this page.

Participant details

These details appear in the letter header, matching the standard NDIS supporting-letter format.

Select the part of the plan this claim will be made against. Core funding is flexible across categories. Capacity Building funding must stay within its approved category.

State exactly what is being purchased, including the approximate cost if known. For example: "Ergonomic support chair, approx. $690".

0/500

Copy the goal word for word from the current approved NDIS plan. Exact wording materially strengthens the claim.

0/500

Explain the daily hurdle this item addresses: what cannot be done now, and what the item makes possible. Mention the item and how it is used. Delegates are administrative decision-makers, so state plainly what the participant cannot do and how the support changes that. This text becomes the heart of your letter.

0 words · 0/500

Which functional capacity domains does this limitation affect?

What could the participant do in this area before, or without, this support? This gives a deficit-based baseline. Describe only what is true.

0/500

Describe the realistic consequence in your own words: loss of independence, a safety risk, regression, or increased reliance on paid or family supports. Keep it realistic. An implausible risk claim harms credibility at audit.

0 words · 0/500

Evidence and value statement

These answers shape how the letter addresses value for money under section 34(1)(c) and evidence under 34(1)(d). Tick everything that applies and that is true.

Cross-checked against the section 34 reasonable and necessary criteria before drafting. Incoherent claims are stopped, not papered over.